Seyfarth Shaw LLP - Boston
100+ attorneys in Boston's Seaport District. Employment-related and broader commercial litigation, business disputes, M&A litigation, labor relations. Trial-tested defense bench for BLS and DMass cases.
Massachusetts Superior Court and the District of Massachusetts move commercial cases on tighter schedules than most U.S. jurisdictions. If your Boston business has been sued, for breach of contract, fraud, partnership and shareholder disputes, or Chapter 93A unfair-trade claims, the firms below defend Massachusetts companies in state and federal court every week.
Updated March 19, 2026
Most Boston litigation defense work falls into a few recurring categories: contract and partnership disputes between Massachusetts businesses, Chapter 93A unfair-trade-practice claims (Massachusetts's broad consumer-and-business protection statute), restrictive-covenant disputes governed by the 2018 Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act, complex commercial cases in the Business Litigation Session (BLS) of Massachusetts Superior Court, and federal commercial cases in the District of Massachusetts.
Massachusetts has a distinctive statute defense lawyers in other states are not used to. Chapter 93A is the Commonwealth's unfair-and-deceptive-business-practices law. Section 11 applies to business-to-business disputes and allows for treble damages and attorney fees on a knowing or willful violation. Plaintiffs send a 30-day demand letter before suit. Failing to respond, or responding inadequately, almost guarantees fee-shifting. Defense strategy in Boston frequently centers on the 93A response.
The Business Litigation Session is a specialized docket in Massachusetts Superior Court (Suffolk County) that handles complex commercial cases. BLS judges are commercial specialists, discovery is managed actively, and case schedules are predictable. For Boston defendants in a sophisticated commercial dispute, BLS assignment often means a faster, cleaner case.
The District of Massachusetts is one of the more active federal courts in New England. Cases removed from Superior Court under diversity jurisdiction often benefit defendants by tightening discovery and standardizing motion practice. A defense firm with both BLS and District of Massachusetts experience can tell you within a meeting whether removal makes sense.
100+ attorneys in Boston's Seaport District. Employment-related and broader commercial litigation, business disputes, M&A litigation, labor relations. Trial-tested defense bench for BLS and DMass cases.
Multi-practice Boston firm since 1984. Commercial disputes, tax controversy litigation, real estate litigation, estate-related contested matters. Strong trial bench in BLS and Suffolk Superior.
Boston commercial litigation boutique. Breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, business torts, unfair-and-deceptive-practice (Chapter 93A) defense, trade secrets and non-competition disputes.
Downtown Boston business litigation firm. Super Lawyers ranking places the firm and its lawyers in the top 3% of business litigators in Massachusetts.
Boston office of Troutman Pepper Locke. Metropolitan Tier 1 in 2026 Best Law Firms for business disputes including antitrust, securities, product liability, and consumer fraud defense.
Boston litigation defense rates run $425-$800/hour at focused litigation boutiques, $650-$1,050/hour at established mid-market firms, and $1,000-$1,700/hour at AmLaw 100 partners with Boston offices. Associates run 50-65% of partner rates.
Phased budgets for typical Boston commercial disputes look like: $60,000-$175,000 for cases resolving on a motion to dismiss or early mediation, $250,000-$650,000 through summary judgment in BLS or the District of Massachusetts, and $750,000-$3M+ for cases tried to a jury.
Insurance recovery matters in Massachusetts. D&O, CGL, EPLI, professional liability, and cyber policies frequently trigger coverage. The state's duty-to-defend doctrine is policyholder-friendly. Get a written coverage opinion before committing to a defense strategy.
Massachusetts answer deadline is 20 days from service under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(a). Motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) extend the answer date if timely filed. A defense firm needs 3-5 days to evaluate strategy and identify Chapter 93A or removal issues.
BLS commercial cases typically reach trial in 14-24 months, with most cases resolving at summary judgment or mediation. BLS case-management orders are predictable; discovery cutoffs commonly land at 9-12 months.
District of Massachusetts schedules move on the federal judge's individual standing orders. Rule 16 conferences are typically held within 90 days, discovery cutoffs at 9-14 months, and trial dates at 14-22 months. Magistrate judges resolve discovery disputes quickly.
Tell us briefly what is going on. We route a confidential request to the best-fit Boston firm in our directory.